Brought to you by VESTBERRY - Portfolio Intelligence Platform for Data Driven VCs

The question for every modern VC: Is your team spending more time reporting data than acting on it?

Moving from manual, backward-looking portfolio reviews to a proactive, structured way of generating insight is key to delivering better returns. This guide introduces a simple two-tier framework for automating your data foundation, so partners and ops teams can spend their time where it matters most: creating value and supporting the right companies at the right moment.

Download the playbook and start the new year with data-driven portfolio monitoring.


Welcome to another Data Driven VC “Insights” episode where we cover the most interesting startup research & reports from the past two weeks.

Size of HR and Talent Teams Across Company Sizes

In his research, Matt Schulman examines current benchmarks for HR and Talent Acquisition team sizing, linking them to company size and structure. He uses recent market data to show how many full-time employees are typically supported by one HR team member.

  • 38 FTEs per HR for Private Companies Under 1,000 Employees:
    The analysis finds a median ratio of 38 full-time employees per HR team member in smaller private companies, which translates to roughly 13 HR and recruiting staff for a 500-person organization.

  • 32 to 33 FTEs per HR for Larger and Public Companies:
    Private companies with more than 1,000 employees average 32 FTEs per HR team member, while public companies sit close at 33, suggesting tighter HR coverage as organizational complexity increases.

  • 59 FTEs at the 75th Percentile Shows Wide Variation:
    At the upper end, smaller private companies reach up to 59 FTEs per HR team member, highlighting significant variance and showing how tooling, structure, and efficiency can stretch HR capacity.

✈️ KEY TAKEAWAYS

Across company types, HR and recruitment staffing ratios cluster between 32 and 38 employees per HR team member, but wide percentile ranges suggest there is no single ideal model. The article positions these benchmarks as a diagnostic tool, especially as AI adoption may push future HR teams toward leaner configurations.

Who Should Send Recruiting Messages

Aline Lerner analyzed nearly 8,000 recruiting messages from Hired’s early years to test whether outreach from founders performs better than messages from recruiters or engineers. After controlling for personalization and company effects, she shows that the sender matters far less than many founders assume.

logo

Subscribe to our premium content to read the rest.

Become a paying subscriber to get access to this post and other resources from our exclusive Data Driven VC community.

Upgrade

A subscription gets you:

  • Products like automation templates, prompt libraries, AI copilots
  • 100+ masterclasses with experts from leading funds
  • Access to our exclusive Slack community
  • ... and lots more

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading