This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

👋 Hi, I’m Andre and welcome to my newsletter Data Driven VC which is all about becoming a better investor with data and AI.

👉Join our DDVC x Slush Breakfast in Helsinki Nov 18 with Goodwin & Harmonic

Brought to you by Granola – AI Copilot for Back2Back Meetings

You know those meetings where a random bot joins and suddenly everyone’s distracted? Granola works differently.

There are no meeting bots. Nothing weird joins your call.

Granola transcribes directly from your computer or phone audio. It works across any meeting tool: Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams. And even for in-person conversations just click to start.

Our team has been using it for years and couldn’t live without it anymore. Now you can test it 1 month for free with code "DATA100OFF"


Welcome to another Data Driven VC “Insights” episode where we cover the most interesting research and reports about startups, GPs, LPs, AI & automation.

The Biggest Opportunity in Software

Tomasz Tunguz argues that AI inference is about to pass databases as the most important market in software, and that every application becomes a reseller of AI.

  • $350B vs. $190B by 2027: AI inference is projected to reach about $350B by 2027, passing the $190B database market by nearly 2x. Companies paid roughly $25B to run AI models in 2025.

  • Customers Pay for Usage: Tunguz expects every software application to become a reseller of AI, so customer bills follow usage and could far exceed the seat license or base subscription.

  • Margins Shrink: Traditional software keeps about 72 cents of every revenue dollar after direct costs. AI usage could take more than half of revenue, so margins fall unless companies cut AI use per task or prices drop.

❝

✈ KEY TAKEAWAYS

For firms building on AI models or buying from AI companies, costs are likely to follow usage, so a heavily used tool can cost far more than its seat license suggests. The budget line starts to behave like cloud spend, which means tracking cost per unit of use rather than per user.

Who Hits Most Outliers?

Dan Gray at Odin uses Dealroom data to show that emerging managers back more outlier profiles than megafunds, and concludes that venture will keep relying on them for discovery.

  • 2x the Outlier Profiles: Analyzing the data, Gray finds that the average emerging manager backs more than twice as many outlier profiles per investment as a megafund.

  • Pooling Widens the Range: Combining five emerging manager portfolios widens the range of investments significantly, while the same does not hold for the more homogeneous megafunds, so a basket of small funds buys broader exposure.

  • Megafunds Cluster on AI: AI makes up 82.7% to 89.5% of five megafunds' technology-labeled Seed rounds in 2023 to 2025, while 11 emerging managers range from 15.4% to 100%. Gray sees megafunds crowding into the most legible category, which leaves discovery of companies outside it to emerging managers.

❝

✈ KEY TAKEAWAYS

If venture keeps relying on emerging managers for discovery, LPs may want to look at how much of their allocation reaches them. A portfolio built only from the largest funds risks owning the same consensus bets as everyone else.

Upgrade your subscription to access our premium content & join the Data Driven VC community

Timing a Round Is a Decisive Moment

Aaron Harris at Magid explains that raise timing follows what he calls the Decisive Moment, now that metrics no longer decide rounds.

  • AI Sped Up the Numbers: AI accelerated innovation so much that some companies now reach $10M in 18 months and $1B in under two years. When that keeps happening, investors lose the ability to tell normal from exceptional.

  • Metrics Stopped Predicting Rounds: Rounds worth hundreds of millions have closed at very small revenue, while companies with far more revenue have failed to raise. With copied technology no longer differentiating, nearly every round now rests on the founder and team.

  • Three Elements Make the Moment: A decisive moment is when three things line up: the right business (mostly in the founder's control), the right reason to raise (partly controlled), and an investor with a prepared mind (almost entirely outside the founder's control).

❝

✈ KEY TAKEAWAYS

Harris's practical lever is finding prospective investors before fundraising and shaping their thinking in low-pressure conversations months ahead of any pitch. Founders who keep tracking what investors currently think are better placed to choose their moment to raise.

Building a VC AI Brain

Simon Schmincke at Creandum describes how his personal AI system moved from answering questions to acting every ten minutes, with every outgoing message needing a matching approval.

  • Acts Without Being Asked: A fixed loop runs every ten minutes around the clock, about 52,560 times a year, on a Mac mini with 107 active jobs and 47 databases. It reads mail, messages, and calendar, a drafter writes the replies, and no step can send anything.

  • A Memory Built Around People: The world model holds what the system has worked out about people from Simon's own correspondence, such as their tastes, role changes, and what he promised them. It covers 20,589 people, about 1,300 of whom carry 5,730 facts, each stored with its source sentence. Simon would build it first if he started again.

  • Boundaries Took the Quarter: A useful agent took an afternoon. The rest of the quarter went on deciding what it may touch and proving that boundary holds, and only three of eight agents can write anything. Repair verification is not built yet, so the morning report can only say a repair was "tried".

❝

✈ KEY TAKEAWAYS

For VCs letting agents act on their behalf, the safeguards that matter sit outside the model: what each agent can read, what it can write, and what can leave the machine. Built for one person, Simon's setup doubles as a practical guide for individual investors building their own, starting with his advice to plan time for boundaries before capabilities.

Join 1,991+ investors in our free Slack group as we automate our VC job end-to-end with AI. Live experiment. Full transparency.

The Impact of AI on Wealth Management

Mr Family Office shares BCG's 2026 Wealth Report map of how much work AI could take on across wealth management, with routine client services far more exposed than advice built on personal relationships.

  • Onboarding and Servicing Gain Most: BCG's chart estimates the share of work AI could take on at 45% to 55% in onboarding and KYC (know your customer checks) and 40% to 55% in account servicing, against 20% to 25% in client acquisition and in mid- and back-office work.

  • Tailored Advice Stays Personal: Relationship-based referrals, life-stage coaching and goals, multigenerational strategy, investment decisions, and the trusted advisor relationship are marked human-led, with AI handling only 10% to 20%, so the more tailored the service, the less exposed it is.

  • Redesigned Workflows Win: Adding AI to existing processes delivers small gains. The post argues firms that redesign their work around AI should cut costs, widen margins, and charge more, while firms with scattered, disconnected data rarely get past early trials.

❝

✈ KEY TAKEAWAYS

BCG's map splits wealth management into routine work AI can largely absorb, such as onboarding checks and account servicing, and judgment that stays with people, such as investment decisions and the trusted advisor relationship. VC firms can draw the same line through their own operations and deal work.

Five Stages of the VC Digitization Journey

Our 2026 DDVC Landscape Report maps VC firms along five stages of digitization, from manual spreadsheets to fully autonomous investing, with Workflow and Fullstack builders at the DDVC core.

  • Efficiency First, Then Effectiveness: The move from old-school to productivity VC is a push for efficiency through off-the-shelf tools. The next step, into Workflow and Fullstack builders, is a push for effectiveness through custom AI workflows and in-house data.

  • Most of the Market Is Still Early: The report places most of the global VC market in the old-school stage, run on spreadsheets and gut feel, while fully autonomous quant VC remains rare, emerging, and contested.

  • Two Builder Types Look Different: The median Fullstack firm has 23 employees, 2 engineers, 9 investors, and $800M AUM. The median Workflow firm has 7 employees, no engineers, 5 investors, and $151M AUM, so its investors and operators take on the engineering role and build the workflows themselves.

❝

✈ KEY TAKEAWAYS

Stages 1 and 2 buy efficiency with off-the-shelf tools, and only stages 3 to 5 build a custom edge, so firms can use the stages to benchmark where they stand. The median Fullstack firm is larger and employs engineers, yet Workflow firms show a small team can reach stage 3 when its investors are willing to dedicate resources to building.


That’s it for today!

Stay driven,
Andre

Reply

Avatar

or to participate