💥ARR Milestones for GenAI Startups, Time to $100M ARR as Predictor, Unicorn Down-Rounds, Decline of Remote Work & More
Digesting Insights From the Data
👋 Hi, I’m Andre and welcome to my newsletter Data Driven VC which is all about becoming a better investor with Data & AI. Join 34,087 thought leaders from VCs like a16z, Accel, Index, Sequoia, and more to understand how startup investing becomes more data-driven, why it matters, and what it means for you.
ICYMI, check out our most read INSIGHTS episodes:
Brought to you by Eilla - AI Analyst Doing Human-level Competitor Research
Meet Sophia - your AI analyst that finds real competitors in 30 seconds. No more guesswork or hours wasted browsing websites. Just instant clarity on who’s actually a competitor and what their strengths are. How Sophia helps:
Accurate Research: Finds competitors instantly, without you bouncing between countless websites.
In-Depth Analysis: Compares strengths and weaknesses, product features, market overlaps, business models, USP and more.
Multiple Sources: Provides insights built on data from multiple providers such as Crunchbase, Cap IQ, LinkedIn and more.
ARR Milestones for GenAI Startups
a16z’s latest analysis benchmarks revenue growth for generative AI startups in their first year, across enterprise and consumer segments. The data highlights outliers and shifts in median performance, as well as what investors now expect.
Fast Median Enterprise Growth: Median enterprise AI startups now exceed $2 million ARR in year one, doubling the previous enterprise benchmark ($1 million ARR). Series A funding tends to follow just nine months after monetization.
Consumer AI Surpasses Enterprise: Consumer startups are achieving an even higher median of $4.2 million ARR in year one, with Series A raised within eight months post-launch, outpacing enterprise in both speed and scale.
Widening Performance Gap: Top performers continue accelerating beyond year one, defying the typical growth plateau. Median companies still perform well, but excellence now means sustained acceleration, not just early success.
✈️ KEY TAKEAWAYS
In generative AI, revenue velocity is now a core thesis: Enterprise startups should aim for >$2 M ARR in year one, and consumer apps for $4 M+. The market reward has tilted toward sustained and highly accelerating growth.
Counterpoint: No Link Between Speed to $100M ARR and Outcome
As an almost direct rebuke to the previous article, Maggie Basta at Scale Venture Partners analyzed historical data and found no meaningful correlation between the pace of reaching $100M in ARR and the ultimate valuation or success of generational startups:
Fastest Doesn’t Always Win: Companies like Wiz and others have hit $100M ARR quickly, but the data shows that they don’t necessarily go on to become the biggest success stories. In fact, there’s a slight inverse relationship between speed and peak valuation.
$100M Is Just a Milestone: That milestone is 1% of a $10B company, significant but not the finish line. Many of the highest-value startups took longer to scale to $100M ARR.
Growth Over Grinding: That said, lazy growth isn’t a strategy. Slow-and-steady progress that decelerates can hurt long-term potential. There are multiple paths to building generational companies.
✈️ KEY TAKEAWAYS
Speed to $100M ARR is impressive, but not always predictive: The most impactful startups often prioritize sustained growth and durability over velocity.
The State of B2B Monetization in 2025
Kyle Poyar’s survey of 240 software and AI companies reveals how pricing is shifting in the era of AI adoption and hybrid models. The report highlights emerging trends in monetization strategies and how companies are adapting to value disconnection from user seats:
Seats & Flat Rates Decline: Flat-fee subscriptions dropped from 29% to 22%, while seat‑based pricing fell from 21% to 15% over the past year. Hybrid models combining subscriptions and usage surged from 27% to 41%.
AI Drives Hybrid Adoption: 53% of firms now bundle AI into core offerings, prompting the move toward hybrid pricing. Examples like Clay, monday.com, Salesforce, and Atlassian illustrate how usage credits layer onto subscription plans.
Outcome-Based Is the Horizon: Only 5% of companies currently use outcome-based pricing, yet 25% expect to adopt it by 2028. Many struggle with CAMP (consistency, attribution, measurability, predictability) necessary to support it.
✈️ KEY TAKEAWAYS
Pricing models are evolving rapidly with AI adoption. Companies are moving away from flat‑rate and seat‑based plans toward hybrid usage models now, and positioning outcome‑driven contracts as the next frontier, but most aren’t there yet.
Impact of Billing Mix on SaaS Growth Between $1M–$10M ARR
Sofia Faustino from ChartMogul analyzed billing patterns across 2,500 SaaS companies to uncover how monthly versus annual plans affect growth and retention in the $1M–$10M ARR segment:
Monthly-Plan-Heavy Firms Grow Faster: Companies with ≥75% of ARR from monthly subscriptions grow ~9 percentage points faster than those with <25% monthly ARR. Top-quartile performers see an 18-point gap.
Annual Billing Brings Stability: Once annual plans make up ≥25% of ARR, growth stabilizes, even if it doesn’t accelerate acquisition like monthly billing, it helps predict revenue more reliably.
Subscription Mix and Churn: Monthly billing boosts acquisition but increases churn risk; annual plans improve retention and NRR, especially for low-ARPA products, with median retention at 62% versus 41% for monthly.
✈️ KEY TAKEAWAYS
SaaS companies between $1M–$10M ARR benefit from a billing strategy that balances fast-growing monthly plans with stabilizing annual contracts: A mix that supports both aggressive acquisition and long-term retention.
Unicorn Down‑Rounds Rare Despite Valuation Drama
Chris Harvey highlights data showing that only 10% of unicorns experience down‑rounds upon raising another round. Among 1,511 unicorns, 492 raised again and just 47 repriced lower post‑unicorn. This challenges the narrative that unicorns frequently crash after hitting $1B:
Monthly Performance Breakdown: Of all unicorns that raised again, only about 9.6% faced down-rounds. That’s far lower than late‑stage private companies (Series D+), where down-rounds hover around 40% .
Late‑Stage Pressure: While down-rounds dipped slightly in early stages (Seed from 24%→17%, Series A from 20%→18%, Series B from 21%→18%, Series C from 29%→28.6%), Series D+ climbs to around 40%, highlighting that valuation pressure intensifies later in maturity.
Market Reset & Survivorship: Despite media emphasis on big down‑rounds, most unicorns simply don’t raise again or avoid hurting their valuations. Survivorship bias is a key driver behind the low overall rate.
✈️ KEY TAKEAWAYS
Down‑rounds are unusual for unicorns that do raise again, even in a market where late‑stage valuations are under stress. The 10% rate underscores survivorship bias and suggests that once you reach unicorn status, further down‑rounds are the exception, not the norm.
Fully Remote Startups Are on the Decline
Dylan Hughes shares data showing a sharp drop in fully remote private companies, especially in early-stage startups. From 2024 to 2025, remote-only setups became significantly less common, reversing a pandemic-era trend that once seemed permanent:
Early-Stage Retreat: Startups with fewer than 50 employees saw the steepest decline from 29% fully remote in 2024 to just 16% in 2025.
Mid-Sized Shift: Companies with 100–499 employees also pulled back, dropping from 24% to 18% in the same period.
Four Key Drivers: Tax complexity, more localized talent, security/IP risks, and pressure from investors are all motivating companies to return to offices, or at least reduce full-remote structures.
✈️ KEY TAKEAWAYS
Startups are rapidly abandoning the fully remote model, influenced not just by collaboration preferences but by practical hurdles in tax, hiring, and data protection. The flexibility pendulum is swinging back.
Thanks to Jérôme Jaggi for his help with this post.
Stay driven,
Andre
Thank you for reading this episode. If you enjoyed it, leave a like or comment, and share it with your friends. If you don’t like it, you can always update your preferences to reduce the frequency and focus on your preferred DDVC formats. Join our community below and follow me on LinkedIn or Twitter to never miss data-driven VC updates again.